On the wall of liberal friends, this bong is running with full confidence. You can try asking them what the problem is:

• The problem can't be solved by slaughtering, of course, because most liberal friends are fond of KFC McDonald's. When they go there, these people do not put meat in the burger, but order meat.  A chicken has its leg piece and a cat cuts its thigh. 

• If they have a problem with slaughtering millions of animals "together" rather than the process of slaughtering,

that is also strange. For example, on the last Eid in Pakistan, a total of 63 lakh animals were slaughtered, that is an average of 2.1 lakh animals in a day. But in Europe and America in total, 3.5 million animals are slaughtered every day. Eid or not. If anyone has ever seen the suffering of these animals on the wall of liberal friends, apart from Eid, or if they have badmouthed their white father for this, then let me know. 

• The problem is, what is the objection to cutting the leg when the throat is also cut in a few days?

So this logic separates us (Muslims) from animals and liberal friends. When a carnivorous wild animal hunts, it begins to tear the flesh of the prey even before it dies. There is no humane element in it that if you want to eat meat, you should not cause unnecessary pain, only as much pain as is unavoidable. But the liberal friends who shared this post are probably wild animals in this matter (because their ancestors recognized them as animals, so it's understandable). 

• If this is not the problem, then it is understood that the real suffering is not of animals but of religion. The problem is not about eating meat with a knife on the throat, but about doing this in the name of Allah and understanding the religious duty. It is important to understand this mental illness. If you see this writing on the wall of any liberal, understand that he is not worthy of respect. Because he does not have the courage to express his real suffering openly and takes the guise of animal suffering in hypocrisy. 

Islam forbids killing animals for no reason and even suffering from hunger and thirst. 

If there is a need to euthanize a halal animal, then Islam orders the animals to be slaughtered in the shortest possible time and with the least suffering. 

You will hear the same class saying on other occasions that humanity comes first. Any work that is good (creative service, education, health, community service, etc.), it will be supported from above. As soon as someone is seen doing these good deeds as "good deeds" for the sake of God, they will discourage him by making him a target of ridicule and ridicule. That is, they have a problem with every process that is happening in relation to the relationship between man/society and God. They are not interested in ending the suffering of animals or humans, they are only on a mission to end this "relationship". They have no rules or standards, like many other things, we could not find halal in the indigenous liberal community.