Large widescreen OLED gaming monitors, once considered cutting-edge rarities, are making a comeback this year. As evidenced by the Alienware 34 Curved QD-OLED and the MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED, affluent gamers have found that the 34-inch, 3,440 by 1,440-pixel OLED format offers fast performance and breathtaking visuals.
The Philips Evnia 34M2C8600 ($1,299.99, street price approximately $200 less) is in line with the trend. The Evnia is a fantastic OLED panel with amazing color accuracy and a stylish cabinet design that will appeal to gamers on a budget who are looking for the best display out there. The Philips surpasses its competitors, MSI and Alienware, with its elegant design and impressive test results, earning it our Editors' Choice designation as the best gaming monitor available today.
- Beautiful, well-known design
- Excellent SDR and HDR picture quality
- excellent color coverage outcomes
- minimal input lag
- Best Review of QD-OLED Gaming Monitor limited The value.
- no HDMI 2.1 ports
Gaming Monitor Specifications
- 34 inches from corner to corner for the panel
- 3440 by 1440 native resolution
- 21:9 aspect ratio
- QD-OLED screen technology
- The rated screen brightness is 1000 nits.
- 1,000,000:1 Rated Contrast Ratio 165 Hz Refresh Rate
To Buy a Gaming Monitor - Click Here
Adjustable SyncFreeSync Premium Pro Video Inputs from AMD(Excluding Upstream) USB Ports.DisplayPort, and HDMI2 VESA DisplayHDR Level Dimensions (HWD) DisplayHDR 40012.1.
16.4, and 32.1 inches
- Size 32.12 lbs.
- Adjustable Height Stand?
- To tilt a stand?
- rotating stand?
- Warranty for Landscape/Portrait Pivot (Parts/Labor)3 years
The 1440p OLED gaming monitor era has arrived. The Alienware 34 QD-OLED (AW3423DW), screens feature Quantum Dot technology one of the first OLEDs It was unveiled in 2017, It was one of our favorite monitors of the year with Nvidia G-Sync Ultimate.
Great refresh rate, and a wide color gamut. The most recent refresh is not much different; it switches to G-Sync for AMD's FreeSync Premium Pro reduces the refresh rate somewhat, and slightly lowers the price (to $1,099). It is largely the same monitor as its still-available predecessor except for these tweaks but that is still a very good thing almost a year later. Like its predecessor, it receives an Editors' Choice choice and a better Editors' Rating for
This UFO Is Ahead Of Its Time
For good reason, curved monitors have finally established themselves in the gaming monitor market. A nice curved monitor enhances the experience rather than detracting from it making shooters and simulation games benefit the most from a more immersive environment. The screen experience is more engulfing the tighter the curvature. In recent years, panels have improved their ability to handle more precise curves with some reaching as low as 800R (the "R" stands for radius).
1,800mm or 1800R
The curvature of this panel is 1,800mm or 1800R. (If enough AW3423DWF monitors the radius would be 1,800mm or 1.8 meters, The screen appears larger thanks to the curvature, which also reduces glare and produces darker-than-expected blacks, Although it has a less noticeable curve than some contemporary gaming monitors such as the Corsair Xeneon Flex's 800R curve), it doesn't prevent the screen from seeming brilliant when in use, as it did with the previous model.
It has a rated brightness peak of 1,000 nits (which we'll test below), an almost infinite contrast ratio (because OLED displays have such a high contrast ratio), and a 21:9 screen ratio, which places it firmly in the ultrawide category. Surprisingly, it weighs a few pounds less than the previous model, dropping by roughly 3 pounds to total somewhere around 32 pounds. Although there have been lighter models—like the MSI Optix MPG341CQR—the weight is generally comparable given the panel size.
Looking at the monitor's design, it has a screen with an incredibly tiny bezel and a very strong V-shaped stand. Turning it over reveals the same Alienware RGB lighting and ventilation as the earlier model, which wraps around the back of the display.
The gap at the bottom of the monitor stand's quick-release button makes it simple to remove the monitor for VESA mounting, and it also helps to conceal cables from view.
USB-A port, one USB-B port
One USB-A port, one USB-B port, and two DisplayPort connectors.
There are two more USB-A ports and a headphone jack outside the panel's region. In the center is the OSD control. Users of the Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5 will not be able to enjoy higher frame rates because there is no HDMI 2.1 connector, although this limitation is hardly a deal-breaker given how few console games offer refresh rates greater than those supported by the 2.1 interface.
The display has Alienvision, which lets you choose from four different features designed to enhance your gameplay by providing you with a visual advantage, just like its predecessor. You have access to night vision, clear vision, chroma vision, and a large crosshair if you need them, but if you're like me, you probably won't change the settings.
On paper, the fact that the panel is a Quantum Dot OLED enables a slim-panel design like the AW3423DWF to give a superior color performance with a higher peak luminance and greater color-gamut range than a standard white OLED. Additionally, Alienware guarantees correct colors right out of the box with a factory calibration of Delta E of less than 2 and cinema-grade color coverage of 99.3% DCI-P3. (In the section that follows, we'll examine these claims in more detail.)
The primary distinction between the AW3423DWF and its predecessor is that the latter supports Nvidia G-Sync Ultimate, whereas the former only supports AMD FreeSync Premium Pro. Fundamentally, the two serve the same purpose: delivering the highest performance, the least amount of latency, and no tearing. Both of them allow the graphics card to set the refresh rate by syncing the monitor to it. The older G-Sync model of the monitor indeed costs $1,199 more. But to use one over the other, you don't require a specific GPU (although AMD GPUs might perform faster with FreeSync, and the same is true for Nvidia and G-Sync).
Test For The Alienware Excellent Overall Results
Your gaming experience will almost certainly be enhanced by OLED screens, but how much? To quantify the results and compare them to displays of comparable size and resolution, we run a few benchmark tests using the CalMAN monitor calibration software, a Murideo Six-G signal generator, and a Klein K-80 colorimeter. Except as otherwise noted, we leave displays on their default settings.
We first test the monitor using an SDR signal in its default picture mode. The brightness and black level of the AW3423DWF were 329 nits and 0, respectively. In contrast to IPS, VA, or TN panels, OLED is renowned for its "true blacks," in which the pixel completely turns off. This results in a zero-light zone and higher picture contrast. The brightness practically doubled to about 611 nits under HDR. (Due to the nature of HDR and the panel, you will probably obtain higher effective brightness than that in spots and details.)
Alienware 34 Curved QD-OLED (AW3423DWF) Image Monitor Testing
- (Click the dots to narrow the results.)
- High-End GPUs in Legacy Testing High-End GPUs 2020PCMag Legacy Testing Brightness 2
- (SDR) Color Gamut Input Lag Brightness
- Luminosity (HDR)
- Acer Aspire 34 (AW3423DWF) Acer Aspire 34 (AW3423DW)
- ARGBU Cooler Master GM34-CWQ
ViewSonic Elite XG341C-2K by MSI Optix MPG341CQR 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 329 611 300 678 215 506 256 395 708 365 Nits (HIGER IS BETTER)
The findings of our next test, which evaluates a monitor's color coverage, were impressive. Amazingly, for a curved panel in this price range, the AW3423DWF covered 100% of the sRGB color gamut, 98.4% of Adobe RGB, and 99% of DCI-P3. In our tests, the preceding AW3423DW model likewise performed remarkably well, suggesting that outstanding color coverage is a family trait.
The importance of color accuracy is equal to that of the vast color spectrum. Thankfully, the Alienware performs well. It has roughly the same reading as when we examined the G-Sync version last year, an uncalibrated Delta E reading of 1.4. When attempting to comprehend Delta E figures, keep in mind that the greater the number, the more commonly used colors deviate from their purest forms; content producers seek a value under 1, and the majority of mainstream monitor buyers seek a value under 2. The color options can be adjusted to further reduce that number.
At 1.4 milliseconds (ms), our input-lag measurement is quite competitive and on par with other top panels, To test how well Alienware handled both high and changing frame rates, we ran the video games Counter-Strike: Global Assault and Cyberpunk 2077 on it. The results were encouraging. While playing either game, we experienced no ghosting, and there were no observable quality variations between this and the previous version.
The highest refresh rate has decreased by 10, which is a minor issue to keep in mind, but I don't believe it will have a significant impact on most gamers outside of the hardcore community. Overall, everything looked fantastic on the curved screen—movies, games, photographs, and the like.
One of the greatest curved gaming monitors available today is Alienware's new 34-inch QD-OLED, which has a minor price reduction and switches from Nvidia G-Sync to AMD FreeSync.
To Buy a Gaming Monitor - Click Here
Editor's Choice: Top 5 LG TVs for 2023
Q.1: Is the Alienware OLED display pricey?
Ans: After the hardware modifications, I believe this monitor offers a full OLED PC gaming experience that is well worth the high price. I've used 4K monitors before, but the 3440x1440p resolution of the Alienware OLED is superior. Most games run it even better than 4k resolution because it is 1440p.
Q.2: Are OLED screens available for Alienware?
Ans: The Final Verdict. One of the greatest curved gaming monitors available today is Alienware's new 34-inch QD-OLED, which has a minor price reduction and switches from Nvidia G-Sync to AMD FreeSync.
Q.3: Do I need an OLED gaming monitor?
Ans: They can provide accurate color across gamuts for professional applications and have the fast refresh rate and low response time that gamers hanker after. OLED technology is still expensive, but costs have been declining, so individuals with some extra cash can sometimes find a good monitor for less than $1,000.
Overall, not much has changed since our previous evaluation of the 34-inch QD-OLED display from Alienware, but that's in no way a negative thing. For the price, the ultrawide display is still impressive and is a great option for anyone curious about OLED technology. Even though an OLED has a few minor drawbacks, it's impossible to be upset with it because it excels in so many other ways.
This year will undoubtedly see a tonne more OLED versions, but we predict that the Alienware screen has more than enough durability to stand up to tough competition.